Information from 2000 Missouri Rice Research Update, February 2001.

Flood Termination on Water-seeded Rice

Gene Stevens, Alan Sheckell, Chris Moylan, Holly Wilson, Keith BirminghamGreen Line

Abstract

The objective of this test is to determine when the optimal time is to take the flood off of water seeded rice. This study was conducted at the University of Missouri Lee Farm at Portageville. Drew, Cypress, and Cocodrie were tested on zero-grade pans. Yields were reduced significantly in each variety when the flood was drained before the soft dough stage (at least one yellow hull). Yields and milling properties were also reduced when harvest was delayed until grain moisture decreased to 9.5% (October 25) as compared to 22% (September 18).

Introduction

In 1999, approximately 40% of the Missouri rice farmers used the DD-50 program. This program is used to improve timeliness of rice management decisions by utilizing temperature data from the Commercial Agriculture weather station network.

We have been able to do a good job of calibrating model to the growth stages of each of the major rice varieties grown on drill seeded rice by using field data at the Missouri Rice Farm. However, we do not have a good database for making recommendations on when to terminate flood irrigation on rice. This is important because it effects rice yield, milling properties and timeliness of harvest.

Materials and Methods

In the fall of 1999, a 10-acre field of Sharkey clay soil at the University of Missouri Lee Farm was put to zero-grade. Permanent levees were constructed around the field. At two locations in the field, we installed pipes and gates to control the water depth in the field. A cross leeve was built to make a smaller field for conducting a flood termination experiment. Twelve rice pans (120 feet X 40 feet) were constructed in this area. A system of drain pipes with separate controls were placed in each individual pan. These pipes were made to control flood depth and to allow complete drainage into a main ditch. This main ditch was connected to an exit pipe at one end of the field.

A permanent flood was established in all of the pans. Drew, Cypress and Cocodrie rice seeds were soaked in sacks for 24 hours and drained for 12 hours. Each pan was divided into three equal size subplots. Varieties were water-seeded into subplots.

Pre-germinated seeds were broadcast by hand on May, 15 2000. There were four flood termination treatments with three different varieties. The flood was taken off at different growth stages. The target growth stages for draining the pans were 50% heading, soft dough (1 grain yellow), ½ straw hulls, and all brown hulls. These growth stages were based on Drew while the Cocodrie matured earlier and Cypress matured later. The Cypress and Cocodrie received 90 lb N per acre of urea applied 30 days after seeding. The Drew had 75 lb N per acre applied at the same time. All the varieties had one 60 lb N per acre midseason application applied with an airplane. There were two harvest dates to see how the milling would be effected after the flood had been taken off the rice.

Results

Rice yields were reduced when pans were drained before the soft dough stage (at least one yellow hull). The table in the next column shows the rainfall that occurred when rice was maturing. Yields decreased between the first and the second harvest. The average moisture content of the grain at the first harvest (Sept. 18) was 22%. The pans that were drained at 50% heading averaged 18% moisture. The yield reduction was due to shattering, lodging, and bird damage. The average grain moisture content of the second harvest was 9.5% (October 25). There were more broken grains (% head) in samples from this date.

DateRainfall, in.
Aug 18 0.19
Aug 20 0.12
Aug 24 0.78
Aug 25 0.42
Sep 8 0.03
Sep 11 0.37
Sep 12 0.14
Sep 14 0.04
Total 2.09

Conclusion

The first year results showed that the 50% heading stage is too early to terminate the flood. All varieties had good high yields in the soft dough stage. The best time to terminate the flood may be between soft dough and ½ straw hull stage.

Table 1. Effect of flood termination on water seed rice yields.

Trt Flood
Drained
Description at
Flood
Termination
Variety Milling Yield Bu/Acre
Harvested
Sept. 18
Harvested
Oct. 25
Harvest
Sept.
18
Bu/a
Harvest
Oct.
25
Bu/a
Head
%
Total
%
Head
%
Total
%
1Aug. 17 50% Heading Drew 62 70 59 71 153 125
20% Heading Cypress 62 69 56 69 129 107
80% Heading Cocodrie 65 70 57 70 160 110
2 Aug. 28 Soft Dough Drew 60 69 52 70 183 133
Soft Dough Cypress 64 70 59 70 155 137
½ Straw hull Cocodrie 61 68 57 71 182 146
3 Sept. 5 ½ Straw hull Drew 58 67 49 70 178 159
¼ Straw hull Cypress 61 69 58 71 160 140
½ Brown hull Cocodrie 63 69 60 71 177 146
4 Sept. 14 All Brown hull Drew 61 69 53 71 179 176
All Brown hull Cypress 63 69 62 71 159 138
All Brown hull Cocodrie 63 69 61 72 184 149

Cocodrie matured earliest and Cypress matured last.
Each plot is 1/10 of an acre. Soft dough stage had at least one yellow grain hull.

This experiment funded by a USDA Irrigation Grant.

Green Line

[ AgEBB ] - [ Missouri Rice ]