Economic Impact of U.S. Pork Trade, 1986-2008

Glenn Grimes,Professor Emeritus, Agricultural Economics,University of Missouri-Columbia Ron Plain, Professor, Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri-Columbia

Dept. of Agricultural Economics Working Paper No. AEWP 2009-2

green line

The changes in U.S. pork trade in the past 23 years are quite impressive. U.S. pork exports have grown from 86 million pounds carcass weight equivalent in 1986 to 3.1 billion pounds in 2007. Another comparison shows that the U.S. has gone from a negative 1.036 billion pounds net export in 1986 to a positive 3,836 billion pounds in 2008 (Table 1).

The value of pork and pork byproduct exports has grown from $1.97 per hog slaughtered in 1986 to $41.94 per head slaughtered in 2008 (Table 2).

These changes in trade have permitted the pork industry to grow at an additional rate of about 1.09% per year on average over the last 23 years. In other words, the U.S. pork industry was about 27 million head larger in 2008 than it would have been had pork imports and exports remained at 1986 levels.

Not only has the increase in the quantity of pork traded allowed the industry to grow without lowering prices, but it has also added to producers’ incomes in the years when net exports grew. Table 3 shows our efforts to calculate the effect of imports and exports on the price of hogs between 1986 to 2008. We believe these estimates are conservative because they show that prices increased only in the year when net exports grew. In other words, we assumed producers reacted to higher prices by increasing the U.S. herd enough to offset any price benefits from net export growth in the following years. Some observers do not believe producers could react this quickly or increase production enough to completely offset benefits in the following years.

Pork producers can take credit for much of this export growth. They have funded promotion efforts and improved the quality of pork which has made it more competitive. Efforts by the U.S. government to liberalize trade, as well as improved per capita incomes in many countries were also important factors in increasing exports. Japan is the largest U.S. pork customer, purchasing about 28% of our exports in 2008. China is second and Mexico is third in tonnage purchased from the U.S. Table 4 shows our most important pork customers by their percentage share of U.S. pork exports purchased in 2008 based on carcass weight equivalent.

Three major groups in the U.S. have contributed to the promotion of pork exports. They are USDA, the U.S. meat packing industry, and hog producers. No studies have been made, that we are aware of, to determine the amount of credit each of these groups should receive for increasing the growth in pork exports. Pork producers alone have spent nearly $69 million in the last 23 years to promote exports through Pork Checkoff funds.

We believe the total income of all U.S. pork producers has been improved by $12.2 billion over the last 23 years by the increase in exports (Table 3). Less than 8% of this would be required to repay all of the $952 million in Checkoff contributions by producers during this period.

 

Table 1
U.S. Pork Imports and Exports
(million pounds)

YearPork ImportsPork ExportsNet Pork Exports
1986112286 - 1036
19871195109 - 1086
19881137195 - 942
1989 896268 - 628
1990 898243 - 655
1991 775290 - 485
1992 646420 - 226
1993 740446 - 294
1994 744549 - 195
1995 664787 123
1996 619970 351
1997 6341044 410
1998 7051230 525
1999 8271277 451
2000 9671287 320
2001 9511559 608
200210711612 541
200311851717 532
200410992181 1082
200510242666 1642
2006 9902995 2005
2007 9693138 2169
2008 8324668 3836

 

Table 2
Value of U.S. Pork and Byproduct Exports to the Pork Industry
per Head of Total U.S. Slaughter

YearValue of PorkValue of ByproductsTotal
1986$ 1.05$ 0.92$ 1.97
1987$ 1.59$ 1.10$ 2.69
1988$ 2.84$ 1.62$ 4.46
1989$ 3.72$ 1.35$ 5.07
1990$ 3.84$ 1.51$ 5.35
1991$ 3.79$ 1.71$ 5.50
1992$ 4.76$ 1.66$ 6.42
1993$ 5.20$ 1.61$ 6.81
1994$ 5.73$ 1.80$ 7.53
1995$ 8.79$ 1.83$10.62
1996$11.02$ 1.82$12.84
1997$11.36$ 2.46$13.82
1998$10.17$ 2.13$12.30
1999$10.86$ 1.83$12.69
2000$12.34$ 2.00$14.34
2001$14.17$ 2.23$16.40
2002$13.42$ 2.02$15.44
2003$13.80$ 2.38$16.18
2004$18.15$ 3.38$21.53
2005$22.01$ 3.43$25.44
2006$23.97$ 3.38$27.35
2007$25.21$ 3.68$28.89
2008$35.35$ 6.59$41.94

 

Table 3
Checkoff Funding of Export Promotion, Net Pork Trade, and
Estimated Benefit to Producers from Changes in Exports and Imports

YearCheckoff
funding
mil $
Net import or
export2
%
Benefit1 to Producers from Enhanced Pork Trade
Total3
mil. $
per cwt.
$
per hog
$
2008 4.9 16.43 net exp. 4,723.5 15.60 40.56
2007 4.7 9.91 net exp. 233.6 0.82 2.14
2006 4.2 9.53 net exp. 1,051.6 3.76 10.04
2005 4.8 7.94 net exp. 1,840.6 6.67 17.77
2004 4.4 5.27 net exp. 1,654.2 6.05 15.99
2003 4.7 2.67 net exp. - 46.3- 0.17 - 0.46
2002 4.8 2.75 net exp. - 199.9- 0.76 - 1.99
2001 5.2 3.18 net exp. 810.7 3.18 8.28
2000 5.2 1.69 net exp. - 377.7- 1.49 - 3.86
1999 4.9 2.33 net exp. - 129.2- 0.49 - 1.27
1998 5.7 2.76 net exp. 114.7 0.45 1.14
1997 4.8 2.37 net exp. 136.0 0.58 1.48
1996 2.5 2.05 net exp. 363.4 2.45 6.10
1995 1.8 0.69 net exp. 597.4 2.49 6.20
1994 1.3 1.11 net exp. 200.3 0.84 2.09
1993 1.2 1.73 net exp. - 149.9- 0.65 - 1.61
1992 1.1 1.31 net exp. 545.9 2.35 5.75
1991 1.0 3.04 net exp. 419.5 1.94 4.76
1990 0.7 4.28 net exp. - 67.9- 0.33 - 0.80
1989 0.5 3.98 net exp. 368.1 1.72 4.15
1988 0.3 6.03 net exp. 277.5 1.31 3.16
1987 0.1 7.59 net exp.      
Total68.5 12,166.5avg. 2.21avg. 5.70

1Benefit is the increase in prices attributable to the changes in domestic supply resulting from trade.

2Net import or export as percent of U.S. production

3Used -0.5 elasticity 1988-1990
 Used -0.3 elasticity 1991-1999
 Used -0.2 elasticity 2000-2008

 

Table 4
U.S. Pork Exports by Country in 2008
Percent Share of Tonnage

Country% of U.S. Exports
Japan 28.4
China (mainland) and Hong Kong18.2
Mexico 14.4
Russia 9.2
Canada 9.0
South Korea 6.4
Australia 2.3
China (Taiwan) 1.2
Other 10.8

This study was funded by the University of Missouri and National Pork Board.

green line

[ AgEBB ] - [ Farm Marketing ]