To send a message to an author, click on the author's name at the end of the article.
This Month in Ag Connection | Ag Connection - Other Issues Online
Fall grazing demonstrations utilizing stockpiled tall fescue-based pastures continued during 1999 at the University of Missouri's Thompson Farm near Spickard. Two twelve-acre pastures were grazed as part of a larger rotational grazing system through July, and then rested until grazing resumed in October. No nitrogen fertilizer was applied during August due to the summer drought. Pregnant, three-year old cows were weaned of their calves on September 29 and returned to pasture. Twenty-five of these cows were selected on October 21 for use in this demonstration. Cows were weighed and body condition scores were taken. The animals were then taken to the first of the 12-acre pastures. The pastures were divided with temporary fencing material to provide forage for approximately one week of grazing, then the ribbon was moved ahead. No back fence was maintained. The animals received no other supplement with the exception of approximately 2500 pounds of hay which was fed following a 12-inch snowfall that occurred during early December. Cow weights and body condition scores were taken at the start of the demonstration, when animals were moved to the second pasture on November 18, and at the end of the demonstration on December 20. Beginning and ending forage samples were collected from pasture one. Beginning forage samples were collected from pasture two in mid-November. Ending samples were not able to be collected in December due to snow cover.
Animal Performance Summary
Animal performance, weight gain and body condition score change, is summarized in Table 1.
Cow weight gain in previous years has been approximately 125 pounds for a similar grazing
period. However, during previous year's demonstrations, cows were started on stockpile
demonstrations within two weeks after weaning. During 1999, cows were not started on
demonstrations until approximately one month after weaning. This was due to changes in the
timing of some management practices in response to drought conditions at the farm. Average
weight gain during the 60-day demonstration during 1999 was 80 pounds or 1.33 pounds per
day. Animal performance was noticeably lower during the last 32 days
of the demonstration. This is probably due to a combination of weather and a decline in
forage quality in the second pasture. However, this sharp decline in animal performance
from late November through December has also been noted in previous years. Body condition
score changes are similar to previous year's demonstrations.
Date | Weight, lbs. | Body Condition Score |
---|---|---|
10-21-99 | 1037 | 4.2 |
11-18-99 | 1107 | 4.7 |
12-20-99 | 1117 | 4.8 |
Pasture Quality
In pasture one, forage samples were collected at the beginning and end of grazing in the
pasture (October 21 and November 18). Forage samples were collected in Pasture Two on
November 19. Due to snow cover, no December samples were able to be collected in Pasture
Two. Ten, one-square-foot clipped samples were collected at random. Individual sample
weights were recorded for use in estimating forage availability. Samples were then
composted and a sub-sample was taken and sent to a commercial laboratory for NIR analysis.
The results are shown in Table 2. All data are shown on a dry matter basis.
Item | Start, N. Pasture10-21-99 | End, N. Pasture11-18-99 | Start S. Pasture11-19-99 |
---|---|---|---|
Yield, lbs, D.M./acre | 2523 | 830 | 2245 |
DM, % | 41.33 | 58.47 | 52.98 |
ADF, % | 33.42 | 37.78 | 35.95 |
NDF, % | 50.74 | 54.99 | 54.30 |
CP, % | 11.05 | 9.58 | 9.82 |
TDN, % | 65.12 | 60.26 | 62.30 |
NEm, Mcal/lb. | .67 | .62 | .63 |
Neg, Mcal/lb. | .40 | .41 | .37 |
CA, % | .40 | .41 | .43 |
P. % | .28 | .23 | .25 |
K, % | 1.62 | 1.42 | 1.50 |
Mg, % | .22 | .23 | .22 |
(Authors: Gene Schmitz, David McAtte, Jon Schreffler, & Jerry Nelson)
This Month in Ag Connection | Ag Connection - Other Issues Online
Author: This material was adapted from material developed by Greg Bossaer and Keith Johnson, Purdue University.
This Month in Ag Connection | Ag Connection - Other Issues Online
Cole County
April 4 & 5
Contact Cole County NRCS Office @ 573-634-7979
Pettis County
April 11 & 12
Contact Pettis County NRCS @ 660-826-3354
Callaway County
April 13, 14, & 15
Contact Callaway County NRCS @ 573-592-1400
Saline County
August 1 & 2
Contact Saline County NRCS @ 660-886-5773
This Month in Ag Connection | Ag Connection - Other Issues Online
Agricultural Update: A Weekly Update on current ag. issues written by Joe Parcell, Extension Economist, University Outreach and Extension.
This Month in Ag Connection | Ag Connection - Other Issues Online
We welcome Wayne Crook to our region as agronomist in Chariton County. Wayne brings a good agronomy background to the job and we welcome him to our region.
This Month in Ag Connection | Ag Connection - Other Issues Online
Publishing Information
Ag Connection is published monthly for Northeast and Central areas of Missouri producers and is supported by the University of Missouri Extension, the Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, and the MU College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources. Managing Editor: Mary Sobba.